Moonsilver's Journal
[Most Recent Entries]
[Calendar View]
[Friends]
Below are the 20 most recent journal entries recorded in
Moonsilver's LiveJournal:
[ << Previous 20 ]
| Tuesday, November 24th, 2009 | | 12:08 pm |
Coolness
This guy did a video of what it would look like from various places if Earth had rings proportionally the same size as Saturn: I have to agree with the first several comments on the YouTube page, we need to blow up the moon to make rings. Current Mood: space-geekyCurrent Music: The Planets Op.32 Saturn | | Monday, November 9th, 2009 | | 6:42 pm |
Pterodactyl!
I was determined to get out for a walk this afternoon, since it's the nicest day we're going to have in a while. I'm also trying to get back into my exercise routine after dropping the ball during the summer (when it's too hot to go for a walk from work without showers afterward) and a fall with a combination of campaign work and a crush at work. However, the task I was working on once again took longer than I expected, and I didn't want to break in the middle of it, so I finally managed to get out around 5, when it was starting to get dark, but still pleasant. I was rewarded with a great blue heron flying up along the drainage ditch, at about eye level and maybe ten feet away. I actually said "Whoah!" out loud. :-) Those guys are big, and though they don't quite set off the "bird of prey" instinct, they do have a distinct resemblence to a pterodactyl, which I think also triggers something deep in the mammalian brain. I've seen this one before; he's often in the artificial pond in front of the next building when I'm arriving at work, which is where he was headed when he passed me. I got to get a good look at him when I went by. The light wasn't good enough to see his colors very well, but it was still pretty cool. Current Mood: chipper | | 1:28 pm |
Yes I got this article in an email from a Tor Books mailing list I'm on, and it resonated, so I'm sharing it in its entirety.
( Follow your weird. ) Current Mood: busy | | Tuesday, July 21st, 2009 | | 2:58 pm |
NASA tweetup
At the tweetup at NASA HQ. They've provided Internet access, naturally. I feel properly geeky. Current Mood: geekyCurrent Music: chatter | | Friday, July 17th, 2009 | | 2:32 pm |
How did I miss this?
Dr. Demento has been nominated to the Radio Hall of Fame! Anyone can register to vote; let's put the good Doctor over the top! I only found out about this because WAMU is promoting the nomination of Ed Walker of "The Big Broadcast" vintage radio show (and radio partner of Willard Scott their early days.) They're in different categories, so you can vote for both. | | Thursday, July 16th, 2009 | | 3:07 pm |
We choose to go to the Moon...
Forty years later, it still gives me chills... There are a lot of great photos, multimedia and websites available for the anniversary. Here are a few. Spectacular photos from the Boston Globe site. Restored high-definition video of the moon landing. "We Choose the Moon" interactive site with real-time-40-years-later continuous audio broadcast, as well as lots of other audio, video, photos, and other stuff to explore. (Note: this downloads a lot of stuff before it will go past the welcome screen, and doesn't really give any indication that it's doing that, so open another window and wait for it to finish -- you'll hear the sound of rocket engines start when it's loaded.) You can also get just the real-time radio broadcast here.And finally, you can follow the "real-time" mission in text format on Twitter through AP11_CAPCOM, AP11_SPACECRAFT, and (eventually) AP11_EAGLE. Current Mood: nostalgicCurrent Music: Real-time Apollo 11, naturally! | | Wednesday, July 15th, 2009 | | 4:13 pm |
Cool stuff you should see
No time to write clever text, but here are the various cool things I've collected over the past couple of weeks, so I can get my open browser windows down below 30...
- A flash thingie that lets you browse the first test image from the new LROC lunar probe, and zoom in on any part of it. It's just a random piece of the lunar surface, but it's still quite cool.
- You know how our
historical documents broadcasts are going out into space, and the further you go, the older the signals they're picking up? Here is a map of various star systems and what they're seeing on TV now. (From here.
- Another awesome volcano satellite photo.
( Photo below the cut. ) And another one, not as visually spectacular, but showing both the plume from Kilauea and the steam where lava hits the ocean.
Oh and a couple of potentially useful medical references, one about caring for people at home in the event that the flu pandemic (or another future one) is serious enough that hospitals are only taking the most seriously ill, and an article about how the vaccine-autism scare developed, the very real effects of communities having large numbers of unvaccinated people, and how scientists might best deal with similar situations in the future.
Finally, some Twitter-sized words of wisdom from Stephen Colbert:
@StephenAtHome: president obama named a surgeon general. so sad that he couldn't resolve the healthcare debate without resorting to military force
@StephenAtHome: i believe michael jackson's moon-walking was faked on a soundstage in arizona | | Tuesday, June 30th, 2009 | | 6:13 pm |
Learn to be a bat!
Hey, evcelt! Did you know humans can learn to echolocate? "Spanish scientists develop echo-location in humans"They see it first as something that would be useful for blind people (apparently a few blind people have taught themselves echolocation by trial and error), but that anyone should be able to learn it. A few choice bits: However, no special physical skills are required in order to develop this skill. "Two hours per day for a couple of weeks are enough to distinguish whether you have an object in front of you, and within another two weeks you can tell the difference between trees and a pavement" Another of the team's research areas involves establishing the biological limits of human echolocation ability, "and the first results indicate that detailed resolution using this method could even rival that of sight itself". In fact, the researchers started out by being able to tell if there was someone standing in front of them, but now can detect certain internal structures, such as bones, and even "certain objects inside a bag". Pretty wild! I'm not sure if I'm dedicated enough to do this, but it definitely sounds like a fine addition to "things that weird guy down the hall in college knew how to do." Current Mood: impressedCurrent Music: palate clicks ;-) | | Wednesday, June 24th, 2009 | | 12:02 pm |
Medical advice from Stephen Colbert
Stephen Colbert (via Twitter) has some advice for i_scribble: @StephenAtHome i forget - are you supposed to put heat on a bad back or fire? @StephenAtHome it was fire. back feeling better now, thanks to the distracting pain from 3rd degree fire wounds Best wishes for a quick recovery! Current Mood: sillyCurrent Music: birds outside my window | | Tuesday, June 23rd, 2009 | | 3:13 pm |
Negative information content
So, there was a sign on the door to our building yesterday, reading something like: On Tuesday, June 23, we will be testing the fire alarm system from 8:30am to 2:30pm. This is a silent test, the alarm will not sound. What useful information does this convey? All I get from it is the idea that if the fire alarm goes off, it may be because they've screwed up the test, not because there's a fire. But since I don't know, the only reasonable response is to treat it exactly like a real fire alarm, which is what I would have done if they hadn't put up the sign. When they're doing audible fire alarm tests, they say "ignore the fire alarm, we'll come tell you if it's real," which may not be entirely safe, but at least it makes sense. Current Mood: restless | | Monday, June 8th, 2009 | | 4:11 pm |
Virginia Democratic Primary tomorrow
Hey, Virginia readers! In case the 200 robo-calls haven't made it clear enough, tomorrow is the Democratic primary in Virginia. If you're a Democrat, go vote -- with the tiny turnout that we have in primaries for state office, this may be the biggest influence you can have on your government. If you're a well-intentioned Republican, go ahead and vote, too, if you like -- we don't have party registration in Virginia, and only the Democrats are having a primary this year, so you won't be missing out on anything. (I don't think much of crossover voting to screw with the other party, but I don't think there's anything wrong with doing it to support the candidate who you think would be best, or least bad. The one time I seriously considered voting in the Republican primary was to vote against Oliver North, who I thought would be dreadful to have representing our state.) Personally, I'm supporting Brian Moran for governor and Jody Wagner for Lt. Governor, and Bob Hull for delegate in the 38th, my district. I'm also working for Mark Keam for delegate, who's running in the 35th District around Vienna (stretching from near Tyson's to near Fair Oaks.) I can't vote for him because I don't live in that district, but I got to know him on the Obama campaign and I think he'd be a fine addition to the legislature. If you're undecided and want to know more about why I favor these candidates, I'd be happy to tell you. But since most people probably don't care that much, the summary version is that for each of them, it's a large measure of who is most in line with my political views (both how the state should be run and bully-pulpit leadership issues) and what their bio and record say about their ability to succeed, and to a smaller degree, how effective they are at running a campaign, which indicates whether they'd be able to get elected and another indicator of how successful they might be at pushing their agenda. I'd be happy if you help get the nomination for my preferred candidates, but whoever you support, please come out and vote. Citizenship isn't something you are, it's something you do. Current Mood: patriotic and stuffCurrent Music: Green Day, "Know Your Enemy" (earworm) | | Tuesday, June 2nd, 2009 | | 3:57 pm |
Unusual sighting
I saw a Baltimore Oriole in our neighborhood as I was leaving for work. I've only seen one of those one other time in my entire life! Wow! Current Mood: pleased | | Monday, June 1st, 2009 | | 9:15 pm |
Grrr...
You know what I really hate? People who organize conference calls, and even encourage you to get all the volunteers you have working with you on the call, too, and then do nothing but go through the material they sent in email, which didn't really require any additional explanation. In more unnecessary detail than the original material. And repeating some stuff. And only asking for status (other than "any questions?") from the people at the top of the hierarchy, making it even less necessary for me to be on. And when anyone asked for anything to be done a little differently to make things work better for them, explaining that the process had been decided by other people who weren't on the call and couldn't be changed. And I left another more productive meeting to participate. At least I had some prior experience with this, and had the good sense not to invite any of my volunteers to participate. As with several recent suggestions from this person, my mental response was "yes, I could do that if I wanted to drive them away and have them never want to help again." That was a half hour of my life I'll never get back. (But mercifully only a half hour, though it seemed longer.) Current Mood: annoyed | | 12:52 pm |
Quote of the Day
"The act of discovery was not complete for him until he had taught it to someone else." -- W. Daniel Hillis on Richard Feynman(The whole article is well worth reading, too.) Current Mood: tired | | Monday, May 18th, 2009 | | 6:27 pm |
Resolutions
I almost never make New Year's resolutions. I tried a few times when I was younger, because it was one of those things you were Supposed to Do, but I generally had trouble even remembering them, much less following them. This year I came up with a couple of them, some time well after New Year's, which have been working rather well. Perhaps previously I'd been making the wrong kind of resolutions. My two resolutions were "Don't volunteer for something unless I really want to do it" and "Don't get into arguments with idiots." I'll start with the second one. I participate to one degree or another in quite a few political discussions and blogs, and some scientific ones as well. "Don't get into arguments with idiots" is a way of avoiding discussions that are just going to piss me off and are extremely unlikely to actually accomplish anything. It's not about avoiding people I disagree with -- there would be little point in participating then, and I'm not interested in just hearing news I already know or positions I agree with repeated back to me. But as anyone who's participated in online discussions (and offline political discussions) knows, there are people who have honest disagreements, people who are just trying to piss people off, and people who are too stupid or pigheaded to consider any point of view other than their own, to the point of not even presenting any real argument or evidence. The first group are worth talking to, the others aren't, but it can be really hard to resist. Having the mantra of "Don't get into arguments with idiots" has been really useful; it saves a lot of time and aggravation. I've lost count of the number of times I've started to get into something, or even written a paragraph, then stopped and thought, "Don't get into arguments with idiots," and dropped it. The first resolution, "Don't volunteer for something unless I really want to do it," is a little more subtle. On the surface, it seems like a no-brainer; why would I be volunteering if I don't want to do it? But it's not just about spontaneously volunteering out of the blue, it's also about responding when someone asks for volunteers, or when someone asks me to take up a task. I've been really bad about that (especially the last), but it didn't hit home until I had several cases over the past few years where someone asked and I thought "sure, I can handle that," and then spent weeks being stressed about it because I didn't have the time or energy to do something that I wasn't that interested in. This resolution hasn't come into play as much as the Idiots one, but it's been pretty important. Most of the time it's just kept me from sticking my hand up when there's peer pressure for someone to step up, or reminded me to say "tell me more about it and let me think it over." But once or twice, it's helped me keep more control of my own time, rather than feeling weighed down with commitments from my natural desire to be helpful. As to what made these resolutions different from my past unsuccessful ones, I'm not sure. They're things I really wanted to change, but that's not necessarily new. Maybe it's that they just tweak behavior, rather than requiring big plans. Current Mood: contemplativeCurrent Music: noises from the hard drive -- a bit more of a symphony than I'd like | | Thursday, May 7th, 2009 | | 6:50 pm |
Science Thursday
Here are some neat science stories I ran across this week. First, some songbird songs are generated by a multi-generation recursive genetic process. Basically, this is the deal -- zebra finches have complex songs, which are learned from adult finches when they are young. If they are raised in isolation, they have a "raspy, arrythmic song." But this raises a "chicken and egg" question -- if it's not genetic, how did the adults start doing it in the first place. Well, it turns out that if you take the birds raised in isolation, and breed them for a few generations, they develop songs similar to wild finches. With the simpler song as "input," the next generation develops a more complex song, and so on. So in a sense, even though the behavior is partially learned, it is all in the genes, it just takes more than one generation for the algorithm to run. The other story is an alpha-geek story. A guy took his kids on a short vacation to Mt. Rainier to run a home relativity experiment. I think this is possibly the most science-geeky parent I've ever heard about. Here's the background: Most people know at least vaguely that relativity predicts that acceleration causes time to run slower compared to a non-accelerated frame of reference (relativistic time dilation.) What's less commonly understood by non-science geeks is that gravity cannot be distinguished from acceleration in relativity. In other words, that feeling of being pressed into your seat that you get from stomping on the accelerator and the feeling you get from the gravity that's holding you down in your seat are the same thing. And as you get further from the center of the Earth, the strength of the Earth's gravity gets less. Enough that if you have an accurate enough clock, you can measure the difference in how fast time passes between sea level and the top of a mountain. (Down here at sea level, time passes slower, because the stronger gravity is like having more acceleration.) I know that, and I think it's pretty cool, but it's taking it to another level to actually load your car up with atomic clocks (Lots of photos and layman's explanations, as well as a link to more technical information.) I especially liked the part where he explained to his wife that by staying behind, she'd be twenty nanoseconds younger than the rest of them. <g> Current Mood: geekyCurrent Music: car tires on wet pavement | | Saturday, May 2nd, 2009 | | 9:54 pm |
Apollo anniversary
For the coolest commemoration of the 40th anniversary of the launch of Apollo, a launch of a 1/10-scale Saturn V rocket! It's the largest model rocket ever, weighs 1600 pounds, and is powered by nine high-powered model rocket engines. It flew to a height of over 4000 feet. More details here, but I can't resist one more quote: "the nine engines produced over 8,000 pounds of thrust, enough to lift a VW Bug over half a mile in altitude". Current Mood: impressedCurrent Music: the mockingbird in our front yard | | Friday, April 24th, 2009 | | 11:35 pm |
Suck on that, penguins!
In the promo for the new Disney Earth movie, there's a voiceover by Ian McKellan quoting reviews, one of which is "Even better than March of the Pengins." To which I can't help adding "Suck on that, pengins!" Out loud, even. <g> Current Mood: mischievousCurrent Music: random teevee stuff | | Thursday, April 16th, 2009 | | 3:43 pm |
Dewey Defeats Tarzan
I stumbled on a new webcomic that I wanted to share (via a link from PartiallyClips, called Dewey Defeats Tarzan. It's a clip-art comic like PartiallyClips, but specifically uses vintage art, and its style seems particularly suited to my kind of people. A few highlights, cut for large images: ( Read more... ) Current Mood: amused | | Friday, April 10th, 2009 | | 2:39 am |
Pagan music
Okay, so I had this idea, that for certain kinds of events, it would be cool to have some of the standard pagan chants set to a modern dance beat. And I figured that this would be so easy for anyone with a modicum of skill at audio mixing (which I don't have) that someone must have done it. But alas, either it doesn't exist or Google has failed me. (I also tried poking around on some of the music download sites, but needless to say, this genre is not a major part of their content.) It's possible that it's not as easy as it seems because there aren't many recorded versions of the chants laying around to be mixed (since people generally chant them, not listen to them.) But I'm hoping I just haven't looked in the right place. Ideas, anyone? Current Music: None, dammit! |
[ << Previous 20 ]
|